引用:

原帖由 doraemonserv 於 2009-5-9 01:41 發表

你對號入座了, d_gman. <--此為引狗公對號入座的御宅族常用招數
我是不會無故話人的, 當事人 <--此為引狗公使用「無故」式莫須有的「激將法 」
You simply lack some interpersonal sense as most of the girls have.  <--此為引狗公產生因缺乏女性心理認知而形成的自卑感, 以此挑釁牠作出人身攻擊
The keyword is "未有組" in the topic, dodo. <-- 此為御宅族報復狗公在現實作出的人身攻擊, 以牙還牙

LEE個並唔係對號入座的問題~ <--港女主義者常用招式: 濫用 negation, 顛倒是非
未有組的唔係只有你一個~ <--港女主義者常用招式: 捏造事實, 欺騙不知情人仕, 盜取他人認同
我回POST的時侯我都係未有組~~  <--港女主義者常用招式: ditto(「將心比心」煸惑人心)
睇番個TOPIC都知係搵緊人入佢組LA~<--港女主義者常用招式: 偷渡換概念, 令人不知該 post 原意為恥笑御宅族沒有組
再者~你唔好再係度講埋D咩心理/人際關係的野LA~ <--常人妒忌心作祟: 人身攻擊 (Defense Mechanism by Denial)
你只不過係生活係自已個井度JA~ <--logical fallacy of overgeneralization under insufficient condition
你唔尊重我時~ <-- 再次玩顛倒(事情的次序: 御宅族被欺凌在先, 但這狗公刻意隱瞞)
我都唔會尊重你~ <-- (consider above)
再講白D~
如果你咁勁咁了解~你唔會係IVE讀LA~ <--ambiguous judgment
你係大學讀緊心理之類的科LA~ <-- neglecting exception: this is a taboo for programmers, he inclusive
你地招組員你就話人地分化~ <-- frustration of him occurs: he has a typo, the correct term should be "我地招組員...". Kinda of  psychopathological phenomena
你呀媽呀你落街買又咁一定係進行恐佈襲擊~ <-- 狗公 (ISFJ in MBTI)特徵: 庸人自擾
唔識中文字返去借多D書識多幾個字先LA <-- logical fallacy of trilogy again: Using English alone does not neccessarily implies one is thus a Chinese idiot
自重吧! <--狗公特徵: 偽善

Further study:

Ruki: http://www.freedomwing.com/forum/space.php?uid=12
mailto:%20orimotoruki@yahoo.com.hk

~~峰~~: http://www.freedomwing.com/forum/space.php?uid=4
mailto:%20whfung1988@hotmail.com

http://freedomwing.com/forum/redirect.php?tid=687&goto=lastpost#lastpost

非本班學生是無法進入此 forum 的, 因此,
我冒著被 BAN 的危機, 把相關內容備分了...

Topic: [調查] 有冇人FINAL PROJECT未有組? 白刃開組哦..~

http://doraemonserv.mysinablog.com/resserver.php?resource=1994771-hypocrisy+record+3.mht

我是 individualistic, 兼男人身女人腦的 doraemonserv, 對人事特別敏感
在此 mht 檔, 大家可以領悟到:
1. 崇日港女 ruki 是如何program allusion(暗示) 技巧踩低個人主義者的自尊
2. 狗公是如何文過飾非, 濫用權力地為溝女而虛偽, 大玩「無故」式莫須有
3. ACG迷(我以外當事的 forum user) 的無知和愚昧

The discussion participants seem cannot understand my point
so so far (20090325 18:49) no one respond to me.

http://forum4.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?message=1324875&highlight_id=0&page=3

The reading comprehension level of toxic ACG fans sucks!
I am one of the grassroots, but I really hate ACG fans as  二世祖:
e.g.  http://www.cuhkacs.org/~yanlee/blog/

當係興趣都ok既
當係生命既一部份就noway

p.s. 
使屋企$$去敗家二世祖唔該反省下
一蚊未識搵就個個買幾千蚊書同碟

Many simply deem ACG as entertainment.
Clearly, the definition of "熱情" refers to fanship and friendship among ACG fans.
I am an otaku, but not moe one, so my focus on ACG is investigation
and integration with other discipline and social issues.

You may deem me as a toxic guy
because I have tried to cosplay one of the Rozen Maiden characters.
But when it comes to the method of observing ACG,
the meaning of toxic will vanish: I always watch Ojamajo Doremi,
Cosmic Baton Girl Comet-san, Rozen Maiden,
Tsubasa Tokyo Revelation and Black Jack 21 with my sister.
Very often the humanity values of such animes are quite implicit
so I have adopted an literature-wise approach to guide my sisters and evoke their critical thinking.
For example, I will ask my sister (now preparing for 2010 HKCEE English)
to have one-minute indivudual response (Paper IIIB) as
to whether using magics to solve problem is politically correct.
Of course, my sisters is quite introverted
and she even don't know what 政治正確 actually means.
I means with suitable methodology,
ACG can be a good technical source of teaching liberal studies,
especially on supply-side (production and principles)
rather than demand-side(consumerism).

My career pursuit is for educating.
As I have developed my theory of analyzing ACG using existing theorems of Organizational Behaviours,
I do think that my stubbornness toward ACG will not fade in the near future so far.

Source: http://forum4.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?message=1342509&highlight_id=194237

Source: Private forum in TY IVE 08-09 41303A HDSEz1

Original Editor Info:

larrysam

UID

17 

帖子

16 

精華

0 

人品

1  

金錢

11458  

存款

1000  

閱讀權限

10 

性別

男 

在線時間

11 小時 

註冊時間

2008-9-24 

最後登錄

2009-3-9 

Content:

狗公的三度

作為一個狗公,我認為有三種度是必不可少的。


第一就是風度。為港女開門,拿一拿重的東西,
這些都是狗公應有的工作和責任。
凡事讓一讓港女,保持微笑。
這並不是看少港女,而是出於一份尊重和欣賞。


第二的就是氣度。狗公並不會要求做到丞相肚內能撑船的地步。
但狗公便要有些氣度,凡事不要和人斤斤計較,
別要因為別人的一言半語就動氣,更不可動不動就動粗、硬來。


第三就是深度。一個人要學習多些身邊、世界的不同事物,知多些,
識多些,自然人的見識,胸襟便廣闊得多。
在一些場合裡,也不會因為別人的話題而令你啞口無言。


今日狗公的體格天生就比女人強,比較容易有肌肉也比較大力。
既然我們天生是狗公,那就天生要保護港女吧。
如果不打算保護港女的,那起馬也至少要惟持狗公的三度。


狗公們,堅持我們的三度,練好體魄,做個真正的狗公吧!!!!

Source: http://forum4.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?message=1611006&highlight_id=194237&page=3

I use otakuism to verify whether he is, as I expectd, actually ACG fans.
I managed to direct him to unveiling his true but ugly picture, i.e. 因人廢言

你講乜呀唔好玩啦  - ?!?
Having observed this sentence,
I decided to terminate the post by posting my new thoery.
Since he, as a dogman of logical fallacy, is jealous of and reject new ideas
in order to maintain his belief systems that are full of bugs,
I successfully anticipated his real emotion as wanton and emotive.
Eureka! Psychometrics, you have done a good job for me!
Simply using negation without further elaboration never works against pure science stream student like me!

還是日本仔自己發瘋呀 - ?!?
He is getting crazy. To prevent such image, he starts to differ from
the notion and point at me as defense mechanism against his sense of
inferiority. i.e. He has no such capacity to make such powerpoint slides
of my work so he wanna nullify it by using my EVCHK record,
which is authored by, again, shameless ACG fans who hate otakus.

玩嘢呀仆街哂老子時間 - ?!?
Who are you! 大我呀? 以為自己識歷史就高人一等, 扮哲學家呀?屌你老母臭閪!

我係ACG人  - DANGEROUS!
ACG fans are irrational in nature, especially for moe encounters.

我都係新儒家人 - 戇鳩!
冇料到, 識小小扮代表...
He even failed to give his own specification of Neo-Confucianist
while I have done it in the linked 7-slide powerpoint slides!

要講動漫同哲學關係你要幾多我有幾多 - ?!?
You hedonist have your own philosophy?
Or actually your biased value system wanna be propagated?
That's why I do not reply to him: He is talking big.

睇清楚自己講緊乜 - ?!?
You wanna say that I am psychotic in order to disprove all my arguments?
Too simple, too naive.
You are shifting your frustration of failure in reading my text away.
What so shameless!
Also: "I don't understand = you are wrong" is also common on9 logic of philistines.

人類學會好啲 - ?!?
He is pretending to be liberal as well!
What a hypocrite!
The actual answer is ethnography as common runtime language of social
sciences, not simply putting "good" or "bad" judgments that lack objectivity!

In conclusion:
文人相輕
自以為是
狂妄令色
一盤散沙
井底之蛙
無知無恥
感情用事
乃動漫迷之本質也

如果中文依家重要折做XXYYZZ?
What on earth do you mean XXYYZZ?
Also, branching of discipline is NOT segregation but of classification.
He, as brainwashed by HKASL CL&C,
know only that culture other than chinese know only differentiating groups.
In truth, classification also includes grouping and cross-linkage.
So you can imagine how irrational and biased he can be.
Needless to say, he looks down upon social sciences.
Never talk with such a guy, unless you lack independent thinking skills.

In the next post, you will see that, by my continued testing him,
his true picture as chauvinistic arts stream ACG fan will be disclosed.

呢度又係要分中西哲學…
中國儒、墨、法、農等不嬲都重民生社會
由人到家及國
唔可以話唔係人文一項

樓主講純數哲學有啲偷換槪念
係大學乜嘢科讀到上去都叫哲學啦
唔係邊有master of philosophy
所以唔好為一談噃

偷換概念? Or you just don't know how philisophy is hierarchical?

你明唔明我講乜呀……
哲學有分人文哲學同純理哲學
哲學一詞係廣義嘅
即係樓主一開始無定義
所以先會有人咁講

而且你話主要講同社會有關嘅學科
唔好意思無可能少咗哲學
社會主義、資本主義、軍國主義全部都係哲學
不一句到尾
文史哲不嬲到大師級人馬都係唔分家

Clearly 冰心寧魂 is very stubborn for win using his ill-defined argument.

哲學有分人文哲學同純理哲學?
Reductionism is generic and cross-science between social and pure ones!
So his classification sucks!

文史哲不嬲到大師級人馬都係唔分家?
That means their experise is any of philosophy?
Sorry, wrong concept!
The key in identifying philosophers is one's belief system on which
ideology one identifies with.
So so-called MasterMind (大師級人馬) must have their own stance for
certain ideologies, NOT ALL! Otherwise, absurdity results.

e.g.
A is a feminist as well as sexist.
Sinced sexism offsets feminism in prinicple.
So the desciption of A is fallacious.

I deeply believe that 冰心寧魂 survive by abusing loopholes of thoughts!
Such black sheep (he and the like, e.g. ewai_leong) must be get rid of!

樓主係咪西方學派多啲？
因為中國重於「以史為鑑」
加埋儒家精神
基本上無需要亦無興趣去推測如果
多數腳踏實地分析
只有軍事學、帝皇術先有需要去推算
當然歷史都包括以上兩樣
不過整體而言又唔多覺中國歷史需要演算

But with globalization, Chinese history,
if with learning paradigm unchanged,
will be difficult to be in conjunction with
development of World History.

Also, Classic Confucianism is but
one of the political stablization means

有個重點不得不忘記
中史係由上到下咁讀
西史係由左到右咁讀
所以用嘅方法要留意嘅事好唔同
西史國與國嘅互動同變數好多
所以演算推測都合理
但係中國有一項中心精神
改朝換代都無影響
變數亦多為國內問題而非國外

如果以樓主講法
咁一直都係講緊世界歷史
無將中國獨特嘅歷史軌跡抽出嚟講
變成中國係世界史嘅一部份
而世界史係國與國互動嘅演算同分析
係咁嘅....

Source: http://forum4.hkgolden.com/view.aspx?message=1611006&highlight_id=194237&page=2

Clearly 冰心寧魂 is on9 (i.e. very stupid guy)
He doesn't know that HKGolden forum has word ceiling
while he quote other's saying infinitely.
So his bullshit is actually incomplete and partial while in favor of nationalism!

西史係由左到右咁讀 ?
He is clearly, like many quacks who knows only lyrics of history
fabricating dipolarized scale that deliberately direct readers to ignore
the fact that ALL History must have up-to-down (i.e. from ancient to modern)
studying paradigm. Clearly, he has no reason left so he starts to play
logical fallacy up to mislead others in order only but to win. What so mean!

中國有一項中心精神 ?
What is it? He even is unable to define it!
But to all people with strong sixth sense, it is known as utilitarianism.
This alone makes the true picture of Chineses as ugly as what Arabians
thinks of the Jews.
In Chinese, Chineses lacks systematic thinking as they know only analogy.

混為一談?
你自己邏輯思維混亂就老屈人地語無倫次,
沒有自知之名就貿然否定別人,
未免太幼稚了~

樓主(Doraemonserv)講純數哲學有啲偷換槪念?
He alleges that he knows history well, but it turns out to be the opposite:
he is unfamiliar with even the historical development of philosophy.
Not only mathematics, economics is also originally a part of world philosophy.

He always mentions 中國 in a bid to give a pseudo-impressive image to other the ignorant.
That proves that he is quite arrogant when studying Chinese History,
i.e. deeming himself as expert of China just only after in touch with 學術思想史
馮祿德二世也。如成名, 將再害人不淺矣.

一言之敝之:
冰心寧魂, 你這井底之蛙, 說話空泛, 內容空洞且誤導其他文科人,
故唔該咪再獻醜, 速速收皮, 否則吾將繼續批鬥你這自大狂, 至死方休!

He wanna conclude that "Common sense outweight science".
Nonsense indeed.
Common sense consists of utilitarianism.
The fatal point in Chinese nationality is right being too utilitarian.
He is being too complacent in having good grade in [Chinese] History,
but this can only prove that he is a pricky rote-learner.

儒家精神?
No eulogy please.
Confucianism in classical Chinese is but a political means for stability.
It in itself, historically speaking, is not principle but supression of freedom.
It survives, only is due to the king being a think-by-common-sense hegemony.
So his assertion that "history = practical; =/= possibilities" will results
in continuation of fallacies (以訛傳訛)

腳踏實地?
Seems righteous, but as he is already imbecile in logic,
plus his low capacity of acceptance, he can produce nothing new and meaningful!
(i.e. He just know how to make a lyric of what the precedent have said,
without any enrichment)
Therefore, it is he who is the most impractical when societical significance
of learning history is taken into account.

唔多覺?
Don't tell me that you learn History using the 5 sensual functions only!
If so, simply think by ass and many quacks can thus be historians! 
Surely your intuition sucks!
No wonder you are quite insensitive to globalization.
I can tell you that, the trend of globalization is to phase you philistine out
because you are reluctant to reflect upon what you act wrong and
you refuse to adapt to hectic changes.

Again, you are but a junk after getting empty undergraduate qualification.

模組要到研究所以上先有得玩?
Yes, you admit that you are imbecile!
Junior Pure Science Textbooks and even mathematics contains a lot of models already,
no wonder your mathematical logic get stuck!

文理讀法思路完全唔同 ?
If so, why liberal arts education exists?
Science is a subset of art so even pure science models requires fine arts.
All ways lead to rome, dude.

唔一定合用?
He is like saying that new ideas are impractical.
Surely such a judgment is too conservative.
"When there is a will, there is a way." Famous Western saying goes.
He is surely too nationalistic to look down upon worlds other than China.
Without trial and error for ideals, there is nothing called practical, kid.

呢個唔係創意問題!?
Clearly this hypocrite is a MALE which lack creativity in essence,
therefore he uses defense mechanism of denial.

歷史就係base on the fact that ?
ORLY?
He is talking the paradigm of learning history, not the narture of history.
His social science knowledge base is quite weak.

無得話如果當日點點點?
He wanna lock and prevent Historian from being free from ivory tower.
A very stupid move indeed.
If liberal arts education cannot even postulate on history,
history will be eventually phased out for the collective interest in society.
Therefore, although my proposed question on Hitler seems too general,
it will surely initiate a paradigm shift when creativity is no longer looked
down upon by the spoon-fed and dogmatic history teachers.
Why? No breakthrough results in no new energy source and thus future.
Or you may say that creativity is less important than justification in history.
But I dare to tell you that simply justification by dichotomizing facts,
which can be fabricated, cannot solve life problems.
Just continue to be assertive and everyone will deem you as arrogant,
plus lack of embracement of new changes.
That's why ACG fans as [chinese] history learners are that hideous,
less adaptive than [social] science learners and thus but to be phase out!

唔好用自己觀點套落去?!
You neglect the importance of liberal studies?
I am not opining? Even providing more rooms for perspectives is forbidden.
True, you can see that such a learner are too arbitrary and unfriendly.
His horizon of views are thus narrowed down by his semming authoritarian
style owing to chauvinism of regurgitating historical hindsights.
No doubt, he is but a rubbish even in business field.
He better get a life of obnoxious beggar (>XD)